I'm not sure. The book makes such a point of These Are Women, but also I
kind of have the impression Pratchett wouldn't have known what
"transgender" meant, never mind "genderqueer". So while I'm happy to read
Maladict as genderqueer...
I actually thought that the point was that 'these are people with women's classified-as-female bodies' genitalia and secondary sexual characteristics, which is why the whole 'dressing as women to infiltrate the keep' managed such dark humour -- the gatekeeping on gender expression and identity.
Edited (attempting to clarify what I mean) 2017-07-04 02:32 (UTC)
probably not - the assumption could be that these people have ovaries, but if we consider something like XY complete androgen insensitivity, those are people with all the external 'female' bits, but they may not have any of the internal or organs. They will look female externally, but aren't female at the genetic level or at the reproductive level.
no subject
no subject
:)
no subject
I really like Maladict. Does anyone else read Maladict as possibly genderqueer?
no subject
I'm not sure. The book makes such a point of These Are Women, but also I kind of have the impression Pratchett wouldn't have known what "transgender" meant, never mind "genderqueer". So while I'm happy to read Maladict as genderqueer...
no subject
women'sclassified-as-femalebodies'genitalia and secondary sexual characteristics, which is why the whole 'dressing as women to infiltrate the keep' managed such dark humour -- the gatekeeping on gender expression and identity.no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject